Library Future Conference Outcomes
NMSU Library Strategic Plan Working Documents
Library Future Conference--March 28-29, 1996
Outcomes of Breakout Sessions
This document provides the names of the participants in the future search
conference as well as a listing of the outcomes of the four breakout
groups.
Green Group
Facilitators: Molly Molloy and Ed Erazo
Group Members:
Charles Townley, Dean
of the Library; Carol Boyse, Library, Systems;
Adrian Alexander, Vendor, SWETS; Cesar
Caballero, University of Texas at El Paso; Ron
Jordan, Assistant Vice President of University
Advancement; Jim Peach, Faculty, Economics; Wylene
Saunders, Library, General Cataloging; Patsy
Hernandez, Library, Periodicals; Ed Mayfield,
Library, Codes & Standards; Jack Cairns, Owner,
SharkByte; Sandra Caldwell, Student, LSC 311;
Eugenia Conway, Center for Educational Development;
Mark Lescher, Computing Research Laboratory; Anne
Morgan, Library, Head of Technical Services
1.
What will our information needs be in the future?
- training to "fish" (i.e. learn to fish), to ask,
and to surf
- timely access to everything, the sooner the
better
- critical evaluation and information by
software and/or people, a synthesis
- reasonable
cost
- accessibility and training, knowing how to
find information
- knowledge navigator, finding what you need, quality
information, so much information we can't find it
- cost/time issues, watch dog rules, "totally different
five years from now"
- organization of global databases, access to everything,
the sooner the better
- specialization in
collections, integrate and synthesize information for
knowledge
2. What values do vendors, users, library
employees, and university administration hold that will
impact the ability to deliver or meet information needs in
the future?
- balance in the organization and human
interface
- knowledge is power, access to it is power and access to
the widest possible audience
- no
censorship
- cost conflict, tug of war between
vendors and users
- mutual integrity and
respect
- definition of scholarship, scholarship
redefined by administrators, a frivolous tradition versus
real need
- missions of the university and
library should be in sync
- technical
standards
- open and free information available
to everyone
- information should be
primary
- human impact, social impact on
communities
- library interface with community,
retain human interface
- competition to keep cost
lower is good for everyone
- be
proactive
- economic impact
- quality
as impacted by pricing and service
- no
censorship
- timeliness
- interaction
in both university community and with outside
community
- library as a community
leader, library as a valued institution
- library
as a "trophy", quality versus
quantity
- changing, redefining scholarship, not
just publishing in journals
- values change from
past to future, thirty years ago and now
- equity
and free access, diversity, culture
- enhancing
information to
make it available
- no
censorship, culture
- cost effectiveness
3. Who will the NMSU Library serve in the future? What
product/services will the library provide? How will the
library provide them?
Who?
- students, faculty, staff
will be primary users
- secondary users - New
Mexico residents
- the tertiary or third priority
users will be everyone else, including other researchers,
other libraries, remote users, government agencies or
businesses
- there will be overflow or fringe
benefits from our services for primary users for these
tertiary users
- there will also be users from
the region with a cross border focus
- user
characteristics may change
- more returning
students, more diversity, including cultural diversity,
disabled students
- another user characteristic
will be the difference between "surfers" and those looking
for a specific information
- all users will
demand timeliness
- outreach target: people who
have never come into the library
before
- increasing community demand, seniors,
kids, and others who are not primary
users
What?
- a continuation of the traditional products and
services
- more document delivery, this is one of
our most popular services
- customized resources
or guides, value added guides for library
resources
- more training services
information literacy classes, how to find and use
information
- is this the library's
responsibility?
- interactive tutorials
- required orientation to use the library
well (these classes or orientations may be required for
students, faculty, and even administrators)
- special programs, cultural, human
interaction
- more promotion and
marketing
- organizing materials in the
library
- organizing access to materials both
inside and outside the library
- links to remote
information
- scholarly information
policy
- privacy access issues
- intellectual property issues
- expert systems
development
- using artificial intelligence for
access
- more full-text online services
- children's services
How?
- facilities for online
access
- promotion, marketing, and
outreach
- diversity in programming
- user friendly environments
- fundraising
through foundations, grants, selling things, friends
groups
- generate fees through copy card type
services
- have differential fees for different
clientele for primary, secondary, or tertiary
clientele
- build relationships with other
providers
- cooperation
- adaptive
delivery systems
- adjust resources within the
organization based on demand for services
- prioritize activities to provide new services
- use both humans and machines to facilitate
training
4. Where are we now versus
the future? (This group answered this question using the
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
format.)
Strengths
- exploit technologically rich environment
- strong personnel, skills, and dedication
- increasing financial support
- facilities,
centrality to the university
- our poor
collection - we look for alternatives, lower upkeep
- multicultural, multilingual environment
- geographical location shows
great growth potential
- some willingness within
the organization to embrace chaos
- tolerance and
rapid improvement
- support for higher education
in New Mexico
Weaknesses
- poor perception of
the library on campus
- lack of public relations
in marketing
- limitations on good services due
to cost and time factors such as the limitations on the
Pegasus service
- the collection is not fully
online
- lack of fully integrated
systems
- research expectations versus the
library resource capability
- never enough copy
machines
- lack of outcomes assessment
- limited cooperation between or among other information
agencies on campus
Opportunities
- become the
university leader in information resources
- use
the World Wide Web to share resources
- impose
standards on web based data, organize it this refers to
technical standards that are held as a high value in the
library
- preservation
- take
advantage of lower cost of technology
- use
technology to change the values of scholarly communication
this refers to opportunities for more electronic publishing
by faculty
- distance learning, distributed
learning, new ways to distribute services
- fundraising
- fee based services for users outside the university
community
Threats
- eroding
support
- declining enrollment
- an
identity problem, the mythical virtual library
- censorship, regulation, and copyright issues
- trying to provide too much for too many with too little
commercial competition
- private university
competition using our resources for free
- complacency
- power outages
- parking
5. What are the avenues to reach our mission; how do
we get there? What should be our goals?
- revise mission, publicize it
- sell
products and services PR campaign
- integrate
databases, reduce labor
- more
infrastructure
- more collaboration on campus,
off
campus
- creative licensing negotiations
- more funding initiatives
- develop road map and timelines
- reallocate
resources
- follow through, monitor and measure
progress
- cross training
- market
analysis
- develop adequate outcome
measurements
- develop training programs
- develop access points outside library
- build
on strengths in collection
- reallocate resources
to meet the changing programs
- develop
initiatives for changing scholarship definition, rewards in
academe
- developing new forums for scholarship
at a reasonable cost
Orange
Group
Facilitators: Karen George and Donnie Curtis
Group Members:
Angela Mora, Director
of Admissions; Dale Harrell, Graduate Student in
Electrical Engineering; Chuck Miles, President of
Dona Ana Historical Society; Nancy Turner, Thomas
Branigan Memorial Library; Evelyn Kelley, VTLS
(vendor); Tim Pettibone, Dean of the Graduate School;
Austin Hoover, Library Archives; Laura Chen,
Library, General Cataloging; Karen Stabler, Library,
Head of Information Services; Vita Montano, Library,
Interlibrary Loan; Sherry Ward, Library, Post
Cataloging
1. What will our information needs be
in the future?
- quick
- cheap
- good
- multiple formats
- easy access
- how to access
- access to a whole range - professional,
personal
- alternative
sources
- access everyone
- how to evaluate
- human
interface
2. What values do vendors, users,
library
employees, and university administration hold
that will impact the ability to deliver or
meet information needs in the future?
- users value access
- physical values include parking
- interfaces
- user
friendly/graphical interfaces
- user focus actual and potential
- balance of users needs
- increase of resources in sync with
university mission
- aggressive
public service with outreach
- a
basic level of free access
- free
for everyone specialized information for a
fee
- cooperation with other
institutions to meet the community's
needs
3. Who will
the NMSU Library serve in the future? What
product/services will the library provide?
How will the library provide them?
Who
- everybody
... with an emphasis on NMSU mission of
undergraduates, graduates, and
faculty
- minority
students
- remedial
students
- rural students
- older students
- out-of-state
students
- community
students
- distance education students
- supporting research for faculty and
professional staff at University
- agricultural research; including
extension service, agricultural research
stations, and other research units
- graduate research students
>
- parttime graduate students
- walk-in local users
- citizens
of New Mexico (as
part of the NMSU
mission statement)
- out-of-state visitors
- nonlocal phone calls and email
requests
- interlibrary loan
requests
- border area users
(Mexico)
- satellite
colleges
- local libraries
- public schools
What
- everything, with restrictions
- library materials in different formats to
support educational curriculum
- training, teaching and bibliographic
instruction
- provide
information
- provide
expertise
- core
collection
- unpublished special
materials (with
restrictions)
How
- adequate funding
- resource sharing
- regionalize
reference tools
- analysis of cost
effectiveness
- statewide
systems
- standards, Z39.50 and
library standards in general
- electronic information
consortiums
- research on library
use and user success
- staff
training
4. Where
are we now versus the future?
Services the library currently
is offering
- circulation
- stacks
- reserves
- pegasus
- interlibrary loan
- email
- connections
- reference services
- walk-in telephone
- e-mail answers
- by appointment
- the building is open 99 hours per
week
- photocopy
services
- library
supplies
- bibliographic
instruction
- internet
training
- mediated current
awareness
- online
catalog
- library
network
- these are available
remotely
- rush handling of
books
- processing theses and
dissertations
- bibliographic
- instruction in Spanish
- services for the disabled
- study places
- exhibits
- outreach
programs
- unduplicated New
Mexico border region materials
Some of the products the
library is offering
- unpublished materials
- government
documents
- special collections
- preservation
- electronic
databases
- books, journal articles
- AV materials
- multimedia materials
- NMSU
library homepage
- pathfinders and
finding aides
- bibliographies
- Sun News
Index
- Aggie database
- newspapers
- Durango
project
- web based specialized sources (i.e. the
border/Latin American homepage)
- New Mexico state
documents
The current values operating in
the library
- university community first
- more services for faculty than
students
- more services for
graduate students than undergraduates
- important to maintain subscriptions
regardless of cost
- people who
come into the library
- emphasis on
local materials
- retention of all
materials
- bibliographic
instruction
- special materials have limited
access
- reference service not
available all hours the library is
open
- quality online
catalog
- participation in national
activities
- staff access to
training is limited
- resistance to
change in many areas
- community is
welcome
- automation and
technology
5. What
are the avenues to reach our mission;
how
do
we get there? What should be our
goals?
- clarification and communication
of the university's mission
- gather user needs information through
focus groups, surveys, advisory committees,
suggestion box, studies
- user
training/building userfriendly
systems
- identify core
collections
- cancel expensive non-core
journals
- data on use and
cost effectiveness
- provide technical support for university
based scholarly publications
- regionalized resource and automation
sharing
- outsource appropriate
technical tasks
- ongoing and
continuous planning and evaluation of library
programs, services, and resources; utilization
of resources and personnel (involve staff at
all levels)
- avoidance of
duplication
Blue Group
Facilitators: Myra Brown and Don
Barclay
Group Members:
George Barton, Director of Placement
& Career Services; John Knapp,
Vendor, Academic Book Center; Bill
Eamon, Faculty, Honors Program; Judy
Bosland, Staff, Institutional Research,
Planning & Outcomes Assessment. Barbara
Siegel, Faculty, Health Sciences; Jim
Reilly, Faculty, Surveying; Deanna
Valdez, Library, Interlibrary Loan;
Irene Shown, Library, Government
Documents; John Freyermuth, Library,
Collection Management; Barbara Peale,
Library, Collection Management; Cynthia
Leon Coriell, Student, LSC311 Class;
Bruce Porter, White Sands Missile
Range; Bob Ortiz, Faculty, Counseling
& Educational Psychology
1. What will our information needs be in
the
future?
- Easier to both access and
synthesize information
- Reduce duplication and share
information
- Various media:
books, audio/visual/electronic, etc.
- Authenticating the reliability of
information, particularly
WWW/Internet
- More education about
information ... all information is
important
- Preserving past
information
- Accessibility
- Not have/have nots (cost issues)
- Make equipment available to all
- Make information global - reduce language
barriers
- Make information
browseable
- Explore new formats
make computer screens cuddly so people can
cuddle up with the computer like they cuddle
up with a book
- Computers will be
universal; access won't be a problem; users
will prefer electronic access
- Increase the speed of access
- Use for both professional and
personal
purposes
2. What values do vendors, users,
library
employees,
and university administration hold that will
impact the ability to deliver or meet
information needs in the future?
- Mission of NMSU quality, low-
cost education to NM residents
- Collection and access in library should
reflect the mission of NMSU
- What does a vendor value in a library?
innovative, collaborative, problemsolving,
highly professional (and vice
versa)
- Library staff should be
knowledgeable,
competent, sufficiently current to
disseminate information to library's
patrons
- Provide access to all
yet protect intellectual property
- Understand economic value of
information
- Support academic
freedom concept, unencumbered by
institution
3. Who will the NMSU Library serve in
the future?
What product/services will the library
provide? How will the library provide
them?
Who (prioritized list
of who the library should serve in this
order)
- academic, community
- local population
- state
- nation
- world (unique
information)
What
- traditional holdings (ie books,
manuscripts, audio visual materials,
slides, etc.)
- access
reference, both
reference librarians and tools, better search
engines, links to other libraries
- teaching
- preservation and restoration
- document delivery
- outreach to
schools
- unique collections
- minimum core holdings
How
- differing levels of service
- charge for certain services nothing free
beyond basic services
- outreach to schools
- marketing services for fee services
- personal interface with
personnel
4. Where
are we now versus the future?
- the state should relax constraints on
how the library can spend its dollars
- heavy building use with low circulation why
is the circulation inconsistent with peer group.
In addition to actual circulation, how much is
being reshelved?
- should the library
become involved in cultural and gender issues as
they relate to library usage, particularly by
students?
- money is not available for
other programs because of soaring journal
costs
- cultural issues, shortage of
bilingual/minority outreach programs,
particularly at the elementary through high
school level
- no sense of organizational focus
- new members into academic community,
particularly students, are not equipped to use a
modern technological academic library
- the cost of journal/serials subscriptions is
gobbling money, the faculty need to scrutinize
and cooperate on the issue of journal
subscriptions in the future
- the
library is on the brink of change
- the library should
both learn and teach new
things
- the library's patrons should cuddle up
with technology as well as with books
- the library should consider
warehousing/storage of certain under-used
holdings for future
- the library
should install a coffee bar like Barnes and
Noble in the future
5. What are the avenues to reach our
mission; how do we get there? What should be
our goals?
- take big steps versus little
steps
- be more flexible
- more efficiency from library
staff
- zero based budgeting -
start over and redesign
- synthesizing through education, building
education into the process of curriculum at
the university
- do not let this
conference/retreat go to waste
- more staff and more desk hours,
particularly in areas such as interlibrary
loan, government documents, technical
services, etc.
- Think of changing hours of
staff to allow for flexible shifts to
accommodate extended hours
- marketing find private business owners to
help support the library, soft money
grants
- grants to develop
information products
- more
automation to replace paper
- get
rid of chores, change chores
- customer comes first - more and better
computers
- access user
needs
- linkages and external
relationships
- change the rules of
purchasing at the university
- articulation at state or higher
level
- annex El Paso
- better use of classified staff - give
classified staff more
responsibilities
- teach faculty to
become more accessible to students
- change the library's hierarchy flatten the
boundaries
- change the
organizational structure
- charge
fees for special services lobby to make money
with users in mind, to protect people of the
campus community
- better
communications between library and
faculty
- better physical
organization of the two buildings
- add value to information
Yellow Group
Facilitators: Cheryl Wilson and Marie
Garcia
Group Members:
Rhonda Skaggs, Faculty, Ag. Economics
& Ag. Business; Pat Hynes, Project
Director, New Mexico Space Grant Consortium;
Juan Carlos
Wandemberg, Student, Agricultural
Engineering; David Smith, Pysical
Science Laboratory; Don Couchman,
Alumnus, Community User; Melinda
Dermody,
Alamagordo Branch Library; Tim Blevins,
Library Archives; Grace Gonzales Small,
Library, Order/Receipts Unit; Jivonna
Stewart, Interlibrary Loan; Valerie
Horton, Library, Systems; Gwen
Gregory, Library, Post Cataloging
1. What will our information needs be in
the future?
- a pro-active customized adaptive
information search, retrieval and delivery
system
- universal access to global
information
- mechanism to digest
large amounts of information
qualitatively
- knowledge to know
how to get information & hardware and how
to make it work
2. What values do vendors, users,
library employees, and university
administrators hold that will impact the
ability to deliver or meet information needs
in the future?
- continue to provide quality
service and assure the survival of the library
through allocating and developing
resources
- values of library
driven by historical mission of NMSU, not
driven by current degrees offered
- human & material resources should
reflect current NMSU mission &
curriculum
- quality important to
vendors, etc.
- money important
making or having to spend
- service
3. Who will the NMSU Library serve in
the future? What products/services will the
library provide? How will the library provide
them?
Serve in the
future:
- student/faculty
continuum
- industry & business
- distance education
- other libraries
- citizens inside and outside New
Mexico
- cooperative
partners
Wants products &
services:
- refereed
journals
- more social science &
humanities journals
- more hours
opened & more hours in special
services
- more newspapers
- more electronic access
- better "copier quality" copiers & more
of them
- continue Pegasus &
make available to students
- provide articles both in paper &
electronically
- Social Science
Citation Index
- circulating
collections of CD-ROM teaching tools
- WWW multimedia stations
How
- seek out alliances and mutually beneficial
arrangements between library and
users
- take advantage of
opportunities to create revenue and keep
revenue including charging for some
things
- get a bigger share of
overhead from external funding
sources
4. Where are we now versus the
future?
Now: short on
resources, stuck with a shrinking budget,
short on personnel
Future:
- create a system to use
volunteers
- BI
instruction
- ILL window
- process gifts
- graphic design
- closer ties with academic faculty &
administrators
- better communication between library
staff & faculty &
administrators
- train faculty to
train students to use library
- resources will stay static at best;
decreasing purchasing power for library
resources
- community fundraising;
emphasis on building a foundation of big
spenders & small givers
- growing administrative support
- partnering with administration
- more proactive entrepreneurial focus &
activities
- market library
resources & services
- make attitudinal shift
- better online catalog with easier user
interface
- more public service
staff
- more incurriculum
library training for students
- more flexibility in staffing all public
services with all library staff
- a general information desk
- recognize diversity of student body
needs
5. What are the avenue to reach our
mission; how do we get there?
- increase facultylibrary
interaction (marketing)
- explore opportunities for
entrepreneurial activities and market
ourselves & strengths
- library stop undervaluing
services
- higher priority
on teaching information
literacy
- focus on marketing and publicity
- Round Up
- WWW
- e-mail
- usenet
- library newsletter
- update image and meaning of library, e.g.
Resource Research Center
- develop a library
foundation
Red Group
Facilitators: Laural Adams and Genevieve
Cole
Group Members:
Cindy Watkins, Library, Circulation;
Kathy Sowa, Library, Order/Receipts
Unit; Tim McKimmie, Library,
Reference; David Myers, Associate
Dean of the Library;
Sheldon Bartel, Student, College of Ag. & Home Ec.;
Dave Rocks, Admin., CANTO; Chris Good, Community,
City of Las Cruces, Information Office; Robert Watkins,
Vendor, AMIGOS; Linda Riley, Faculty, Center for Business
Research & Services; Sharon Mantey, Parent, Community;
Laurie Porter, Library, Information Services; Mary
Aragona, Library, Development Office
1. What will our information needs be in the future?
- ease of access - televisions, telephones
- mechanism providing machines for access to global
information
- growth away from human interface
- changes made in what, how, who it is delivered to and is
received by
- scope of services is global
- showing use - directing to areas of information
- face to face for some and technological interface for
others
2. What values do vendors, users, library
employees, and university administration hold that will impact the
ability to deliver or meet information needs in the future?
Vendors, Providers
- profit
- quality product to users - quality equals faster,
cheaper, better
- try to utilize economies of scale
- short term focus
- willingness to partner
- ability to innovate
- customer focus
- ethics
Users - Students, Faculty, Community Members,
etc.
- accuracy
- speed
- quick access
- difference between student/faculty needs
- unbiased, all information available,
comprehensive
- nondiscriminatory
services
- discriminatory services cost not based on search but
based on status
- demand for services that are high quality information,
value librarians
- seamless access
- dependable services
Library Employees - not driven by ideological
biases
- value their customers
- customer focus
- library should value their
employees
- ethics of public
service
- commitment to free flow of
information
- commitment to
quality
- commitment to content
- commitment to best, most appropriate
information
- respect of and
between employees
- ability to make decisions on their
own
- listen to, willing to
change, willing to take risk
- high sense of ethics
- free flow of information
- unbiased
- commitment to university mission
- respect
for copyright
Administration
- cost of
journals
- number of employees
- productivity
- customer satisfaction
- serving constituents - residents of the state of New
Mexico, taxpayers
- valuing employees
- commitment to the university's own
mission
3. Who will the NMSU Library serve in the future? What
product/services will the library provide? How will the
library provide them?
Who
- first students, NMSU
- community
- State of New Mexico
- life-long learners
- distance education, more global
- primacy of Las Cruces community over "global clients"
- first faculty
- customers will change, identity less obvious
- both faculty and students are of same
importance
What
- constrained by higher/larger university/educational
system
- interaction with faculty so that information
seeking is more meaningful
- student development
- specialization of resources so as to have a niche (e.g.
agriculture and engineering) so we are competitive with unique
resources
- not duplicating collections but
providing access to other specialized collections
- educate users on services available and how to find
information
- physical location, facetoface, and access beyond "library
building"
- customer focus
- "personal library" access to information services, etc.
personalized (e.g. creating their own library of resources)
- focus on what customer will use versus want recognition of
costs
- knowledge skills, life skills, awareness of resources,
environment, change, values, ability to think
critically
How
- greater role in teaching, involving everyone, student employees,
students, teachers
- commitment to students regardless of "temporary
membership"
- see students as long-term customers:
lifelong learners
- leadership role of library in
university
community also partner/team role
- dependable funding from state? rely on partnership
- expert systems that embody knowledge of process/human
experience
- human backup systems
- multiskilled "information specialist"
- delivery mechanisms compatible with user's capacities,
abilities, technologies used
- proactively soliciting
broadbased support
from all its customers (community colleges, etc.)
- involving all customers
4. Where are we now versus the future?
- underfunded - look for sources of funding: private,
corporations, etc.
- not marketing services
- weak outreach - prospective students community
- what is our niche?
- need relationships with companies, i.e. partnerships, more
development throughout the library
- expand development position - raising funds, making more
contacts with outside sources
- weak development department
- not providing critical skills for advancement
- not
appealing to students at university
- strong dean system roadblock, deans have too much
power
- too hierarchical for effective decision
making
- lack of risk taking - university-wide
- limited hours of operation - no after hours access
- limited effort put into digital format, unique
materials
- resistance to change in some areas, rapid
change in others
- identify current customers needs,
wants, etc.
- identify potential customers
- decisions driven by faculty
- strong staff - needs to be used to higher levels, depended
on more
- fullfill graduate needs adequately
- good linkage with other countries
- lack of understanding of university
mission
- technology has too many
problems from remote access
5. What are the avenues to reach our mission; how do we
get there? What should be our goals?
- specificity - long-winded loses meaning
- goals suggestions behind goals
- provide service
to everyone who asks
- make every effort to reach students and assure they are aware of
all information available to them
- outreach
- change priority of funding
- reviewing current priorities - change to new directions
- providing leadership to university administration to define
basic education requirements
- better educate university about information access general
education course
- guarantee library will remain
- how to get students in for other than classwork
- for students and faculty - not only for
librarians
- take library to people
- what can our library do better - better than other
libraries training, etc.?
- organizing information strong support
- marketing analysis
- canvas community: are we for community? are we offering what
is wanted?
- keep doing things right - retain universal access
- organization - more efficient flattened
- multiskilled team model, quicker decisions,
implementation
- ultimate responsibility
- risk taking - making better decisions
- downsizing too many faculty to staff
- send current employees for training to reorganize skills,
make them
able to fill skills that are lacking
- continued training
- stay ahead of users - be prepared
- needs need to be identified
- cross training - team efforts
- partnering with stronger organization (i.e.
phone companies)
- marketing plan development
department
- tell people how great
you are
- tell what you can do for
them
- public relations
- column in Las Cruces Bulletin
- Sunday section Las Cruces Sun
News
- business section
- look to other departments to see how they receive funds for
promotion, advertising (e.g. art, music, museum)
- let people know what you have
- are we duplicating just to bring numbers up to par with
other institutions
- ongoing environmental planning
- what happens if population continues
to decline
Please address comments or questions about this document to Donnie Curtis,
dcurtis@lib.nmsu.edu, Mission/Values Scan Committee
Return to
Library Strategic Planning Documents
Send comments and questions to:
answers@lib.nmsu.edu